This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
This dissertation proceeds in two steps, a theoretical one followed by an empirical one. Considered together, they help us understand how persuasive language may be used to endorse or justify scientifically shaky policies.In the first step, I introduce and define a troubling phenomenon that may occur in public decision making, Audacious Use of an I...
