Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Veto players and equilibrium uniqueness in the Baron–Ferejohn model

Authors
  • Celik, Levent1, 2
  • Karabay, Bilgehan3
  • 1 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya 20, Moscow, 101000, Russia , Moscow (Russia)
  • 2 CERGE-EI (A Joint Workplace of Charles University and the Economics Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic), Prague, Czech Republic , Prague (Czechia)
  • 3 RMIT University, School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, 445 Swanston Street, Bld. 80, Level 11, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia , Melbourne (Australia)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Theory and Decision
Publisher
Springer US
Publication Date
Oct 30, 2015
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
33–52
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-015-9520-1
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

In political economy, the seminal contribution of the Baron–Ferejohn bargaining model constitutes an important milestone for the study of legislative policy making. In this paper, we analyze a particular equilibrium characteristic of this model, equilibrium uniqueness. The Baron–Ferejohn model yields a class of payoff-unique stationary subgame perfect equilibria (SSPE) in which players’ equilibrium strategies are not uniquely determined. We first provide a formal proof of the multiplicity of equilibrium strategies. This also enables us to establish some important properties of SSPE. We then introduce veto players into the original Baron–Ferejohn model. We state the conditions under which the new model has a unique SSPE not only in terms of payoffs but also in terms of players’ equilibrium strategies.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times