Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Variation in the implementation of PaTz: a method to improve palliative care in general practice - a prospective observational study

Authors
  • Koper, Ian1
  • Pasman, H. Roeline W.1
  • Schweitzer, Bart P. M.1
  • van der Zweep, Greet2
  • Uyttewaal, Gon3
  • Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.1
  • 1 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands , Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 2 Stichting Fibula, Utrecht, The Netherlands , Utrecht (Netherlands)
  • 3 Academic Hospice Demeter, De Bilt, The Netherlands , De Bilt (Netherlands)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Jan 16, 2020
Volume
19
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-0514-6
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundPaTz (palliative care at home) is a method to improve palliative care in the primary care setting in the Netherlands. PaTz has three basic principles: (1) local GPs and DNs meet at least six times per year to identify and discuss their patients with a life-threatening illness; (2) these meetings are supervised by a specialist palliative care professional; (3) groups use a palliative care register on which all identified patients are listed. Since the start in 2010, the number of PaTz-groups in the Netherlands has been growing consistently. Although the theory of all PaTz-groups is the same, the practical functioning of PaTz-groups may vary substantially, which may complicate further implementation of PaTz as well as interpretation of effect studies. This study aims to describe the variation in practice of PaTz-groups in the Netherlands.MethodIn this prospective observational study, ten PaTz-groups logged and described the activities in their meetings as well as the registered and discussed patients and topics of discussions in registration forms for a 1 year follow-up period. In addition, non-participatory observations were performed in all participating groups. Meeting and patient characteristics were analysed using descriptive statistics. Conventional content analysis was performed in the analysis of topic discussions.ResultsWhile the basic principles of PaTz are found in almost every PaTz-group, there is considerable variation in the practice and content of the meetings of different PaTz-groups. Most groups spend little time on other topics than their patients, although the number of patients discussed in a single meeting varies considerably, as well as the time spent on an individual patient. Most registered patients were diagnosed with cancer and patient discussions mainly concerned current affairs and rarely concerned future issues.ConclusionThe basic principles are the cornerstone of any PaTz-group. At the same time, the observed variation between PaTz-groups indicates that tailoring a PaTz-group to the needs of its participants is important and may enhance its sustainability. The flexibility of PaTz-groups may also provide opportunity to modify the content and tools used, and improve identification of palliative patients and advance care planning.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times