Affordable Access

deepdyve-link deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Validity Assessment of Referral Decisions at a VA Health Care System Polytrauma System of Care.

Authors
  • Chung, Joyce
  • Aguila, Fatima
  • Harris, Odette
Type
Published Article
Journal
Curēus
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2015
Volume
7
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.240
PMID: 26180664
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

There has been intensive interest to ensure equitable and appropriate access to the specialized rehabilitative services of the VA Polytrauma System of Care (PSC) for patients sustaining polytrauma and traumatic brain injuries (TBI). A retrospective cohort study with prospective data acquisition was conducted to assess validity and objectivity of the acceptance decision algorithm to the VA Palo Alto Health Care System (VAPAHCS) PSC. Our hypotheses are (1) VAPAHCS PSC referral decisions were appropriate and without bias and (2) the identified needs of redirected referrals were addressed. This analysis included 1,025 referrals (906 patients); 813 patients (89.7%) were accepted, and 93 (10.3%) were redirected. Redirected cases were older, were more often active duty service members, and were not from the West Coast. There were more females redirected due to concomitant spinal cord injury. These are rationale differences. In redirected patients, the most commonly identified rehabilitation needs were psychological support, mobility/physical therapy, and communication/speech services; >75% of patients had these services offered elsewhere outside of the PSC resources. While balancing financial stewardship and meeting our mission to provide outstanding rehabilitative care to veterans and service members, we demonstrated that acceptance decisions were valid and without bias, and redirected patients received appropriate alternate resources.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times