Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Validation of Automated Screening for Referable Diabetic Retinopathy With an Autonomous Diagnostic Artificial Intelligence System in a Spanish Population.

Authors
  • Shah, Abhay1
  • Clarida, Warren1
  • Amelon, Ryan1
  • Hernaez-Ortega, Maria C2
  • Navea, Amparo3, 4, 5
  • Morales-Olivas, Jesus3
  • Dolz-Marco, Rosa3
  • Verbraak, Frank6
  • Jorda, Pablo P3
  • van der Heijden, Amber A7, 8
  • Peris Martinez, Cristina3, 9
  • 1 Dx Technologies Inc, Coralville, IA, USA.
  • 2 European Innovative Biomedicine Institute (EIBI), Cantabria, Spain. , (Spain)
  • 3 FISABIO OFTALMOLOGIA MEDICA (FOM), Valencia, Spain. , (Spain)
  • 4 Instituto de la retina, Valencia, Spain. , (Spain)
  • 5 Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, Valencia, Spain. , (Spain)
  • 6 Department of Ophthalmology, VUmc, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 7 Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 8 Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 9 University of Valencia, Spain. , (Spain)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Publication Date
May 01, 2021
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
655–663
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1177/1932296820906212
PMID: 32174153
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of an autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) system for the diagnosis of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) to manual grading by Spanish ophthalmologists. Subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes participated in a diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening program in 2011 to 2012 in Valencia (Spain), and two images per eye were collected according to their standard protocol. Mydriatic drops were used in all patients. Retinal images-one disc and one fovea centered-were obtained under the Medical Research Ethics Committee approval and de-identified. Exams were graded by the autonomous AI system (IDx-DR, Coralville, Iowa, United States), and manually by masked ophthalmologists using adjudication. The outputs of the AI system and manual adjudicated grading were compared using sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of both RDR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR). A total of 2680 subjects were included in the study. According to manual grading, prevalence of RDR was 111/2680 (4.14%) and of VTDR was 69/2680 (2.57%). Against manual grading, the AI system had a 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97%-100%) sensitivity and 81.82% (95% CI: 80%-83%) specificity for RDR, and a 100% (95% CI: 95%-100%) sensitivity and 94.64% (95% CI: 94%-95%) specificity for VTDR. Compared to manual grading by ophthalmologists, the autonomous diagnostic AI system had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (82%) for diagnosing RDR and macular edema in people with diabetes in a screening program. Because of its immediate, point of care diagnosis, autonomous diagnostic AI has the potential to increase the accessibility of RDR screening in primary care settings.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times