Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Use of sodium bicarbonate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
  • Alshahrani, Mohammed S.1
  • Aldandan, Hassan W.2
  • 1 Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia , Alkhobar (Saudi Arabia)
  • 2 King Fahad Hospital of the University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia , Alkhobar (Saudi Arabia)
Type
Published Article
Journal
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publication Date
Apr 13, 2021
Volume
14
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12245-021-00344-x
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a common cause of death worldwide (Neumar et al., Circulation 122:S729–S767, 2010), affecting about 300,000 persons in the USA on an annual basis; 92% of them die (Roger et al., Circulation 123:e18–e209, 2011). The existing evidence about the use of sodium bicarbonate (SB) for the treatment of cardiac arrest is controversial. We performed this study to summarize the evidence about the use of SB in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).MethodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until June 2019, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that used SB in patients with OHCA. Outcomes of interest were the rate of survival to discharge, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC, and good neurological outcomes at discharge. Odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled in a random or fixed meta-analysis model.ResultsA total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 observational studies) enrolling 28,412 patients were included; of them, eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate did not favor SB or control in terms of survival rate at discharge (OR= 0.66, 95% CI [0.18, 2.44], p=0.53) and ROSC rate (OR= 1.54, 95% CI [0.38, 6.27], p=0.54), while the pooled estimate of two studies showed that SB was associated with less sustained ROSC (OR= 0.27, 95% CI [0.07, 0.98], p=0.045) and good neurological outcomes at discharge (OR= 0.12, 95% CI [0.09, 0.15], p<0.01).ConclusionThe current evidence demonstrated that SB was not superior to the control group in terms of survival to discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Further, SB was associated with lower rates of sustained ROSC and good neurological outcomes.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times