Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Understanding risk for early dislocation resulting in reoperation within 90 days of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: extreme rare event detection through cost-sensitive machine learning.

Authors
  • Oeding, Jacob F1
  • Lu, Yining2
  • Pareek, Ayoosh3
  • Marigi, Erick M2
  • Okoroha, Kelechi R2
  • Barlow, Jonathan D2
  • Camp, Christopher L2
  • Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin2
  • 1 Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA; Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: [email protected]. , (Norway)
  • 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • 3 Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. , (Norway)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2023
Volume
32
Issue
9
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.001
PMID: 36958524
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Reliable prediction of postoperative dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) would inform patient counseling as well as surgical and postoperative decision making. Understanding interactions between multiple risk factors is important to identify those patients most at risk of this rare but costly complication. To better understand these interactions, a game theory-based approach was undertaken to develop machine learning models capable of predicting dislocation-related 90-day readmission following RSA. A retrospective review of the Nationwide Readmissions Database was performed to identify patients who underwent RSA between 2016 and 2018 with a subsequent readmission for prosthetic dislocation. Of the 74,697 index procedures included in the data set, 740 (1%) experienced a dislocation resulting in hospital readmission within 90 days. Five machine learning algorithms were evaluated for their ability to predict dislocation leading to hospital readmission within 90 days of RSA. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were calculated for the top-performing models to quantify the importance of features and understand variable interaction effects, with hierarchical clustering used to identify cohorts of patients with similar risk factor combinations. Of the 5 models evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting algorithm was the most reliable in predicting dislocation (C statistic = 0.71, F2 score = 0.07, recall = 0.84, Brier score = 0.21). SHAP value analysis revealed multifactorial explanations for dislocation risk, with presence of a preoperative humerus fracture; disposition involving discharge or transfer to a skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, or other nonroutine facility; and Medicaid as the expected primary payer resulting in strong, positive, and unidirectional effects on increasing dislocation risk. In contrast, factors such as comorbidity burden, index procedure complexity and duration, age, sex, and presence or absence of preoperative glenohumeral osteoarthritis displayed bidirectional influences on risk, indicating potential protective effects for these variables and opportunities for risk mitigation. Hierarchical clustering using SHAP values identified patients with similar risk factor combinations. Machine learning can reliably predict patients at risk for postoperative dislocation resulting in hospital readmission within 90 days of RSA. Although individual risk for dislocation varies significantly based on unique combinations of patient characteristics, SHAP analysis revealed a particularly at-risk cohort consisting of young, male patients with high comorbidity burdens who are indicated for RSA after a humerus fracture. These patients may require additional modifications in postoperative activity, physical therapy, and counseling on risk-reducing measures to prevent early dislocation after RSA. Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times