Affordable Access

Publisher Website

A triangulated approach for understanding scientists' perceptions of public engagement with science.

Authors
  • Calice, Mikhaila N1
  • Bao, Luye2
  • Beets, Becca1
  • Brossard, Dominique
  • Scheufele, Dietram A3
  • Feinstein, Noah Weeth1
  • Heisler, Laura
  • Tangen, Travis4
  • Handelsman, Jo1
  • 1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
  • 2 Peking University HSBC Business School, China. , (China)
  • 3 University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; Morgridge Institute for Research, USA.
  • 4 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, USA.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2023
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
389–406
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1177/09636625221122285
PMID: 36154528
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Scientists are expected to engage with the public, especially when society faces challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic or climate change, but what public engagement means to scientists is not clear. We use a triangulated, mixed-methods approach combining survey and focus group data to gain insight into how pre-tenure and tenured scientists personally conceptualize public engagement. Our findings indicate that scientists' understanding of public engagement is similarly complex and diverse as the scholarly literature. While definitions and examples of one-way forms of engagement are the most salient for scientists, regardless of tenure status, scientists also believe public engagement with science includes two-way forms of engagement, such as citizen and community involvement in research. These findings suggest that clear definitions of public engagement are not necessarily required for its application but may be useful to guide scientists in their engagement efforts, so they align with what is expected of them.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times