Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Translating evidence into population health improvement: strategies and barriers.

Authors
  • Woolf, Steven H1
  • Purnell, Jason Q
  • Simon, Sarah M
  • Zimmerman, Emily B
  • Camberos, Gabriela J
  • Haley, Amber
  • Fields, Robert P
Type
Published Article
Journal
Annual Review of Public Health
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Publication Date
Mar 18, 2015
Volume
36
Pages
463–482
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901
PMID: 25581146
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Among the challenges facing research translation-the effort to move evidence into policy and practice-is that key questions chosen by investigators and funders may not always align with the information priorities of decision makers, nor are the findings always presented in a form that is useful for or relevant to the decisions at hand. This disconnect is a problem particularly for population health, where the change agents who can make the biggest difference in improving health behaviors and social and environmental conditions are generally nonscientists outside of the health professions. To persuade an audience that does not read scientific journals, strong science may not be enough to elicit change. Achieving influence in population health often requires four ingredients for success: research that is responsive to user needs, an understanding of the decision-making environment, effective stakeholder engagement, and strategic communication. This article reviews the principles and provides examples from a national and local initiative.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times