Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Tools for measuring gender equality and women’s empowerment (GEWE) indicators in humanitarian settings

Authors
  • Goulart, Céline M.1
  • Purewal, Amber1
  • Nakhuda, Humaira1
  • Ampadu, Anita1
  • Giancola, Amanda1
  • Kortenaar, Jean-Luc1
  • Bassani, Diego G.1
  • 1 The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada , Toronto (Canada)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Conflict and Health
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
May 17, 2021
Volume
15
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00373-6
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundEffective measurement of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment (GEWE) is challenging in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), and even more so in humanitarian settings. Conflict, natural disasters, and epidemics may increase gender inequities, but also present an opportunity to address them. This scoping review describes and identifies gaps in the measurement tools, methods, and indicators used to measure GEWE in humanitarian settings, and presents a dashboard that can be used by researchers, organizations and governments to identify GEWE measurement tools.MethodsScientific articles published between January 2004 and November 2019 were identified using Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, and PAIS index. Relevant non peer-reviewed literature was downloaded from the websites of humanitarian organizations. Publications on women and/or girls impacted by a humanitarian crisis in a LMIC, within 5 years of data collection, were included. Publications were double-screened in the title/abstract and full-text stages. We used a machine learning software during the title/abstract screening to increase the efficiency of the process. Measurement tools, sampling and data collection methods, gap areas (geographical, topical and contextual), and indicators were catalogued for easy access in an interactive Tableau dashboard.ResultsOur search yielded 27,197 publications and 2396 non peer-reviewed literature reports. One hundred and seventy publications were included in the final review. Extracted indicators were categorized into seven domains: economic, health, human development, leadership, psychological, security and justice, and sociocultural. The vast majority of studies were observational, and over 70% utilized a cross-sectional study design. Thirty-eight toolkits and questionnaires were identified in this review, of which 19 (50%) were designed specifically for humanitarian settings. Sociocultural was the largest domain in number of studies and indicators in this review, with gender-based violence indicators reported in 66% of studies. Indicators of economic, human development and leadership were uncommon in the peer-reviewed literature.DiscussionWhile there has been some effort to measure GEWE in conflict-affected and other humanitarian settings, measurement has largely focused on violence and security issues. A more comprehensive framework for measuring GEWE in these settings is needed; objective measurement of women’s empowerment and gender equality should be prioritized by organizations providing humanitarian aid.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times