Affordable Access

Tissue polypeptide specific antigen (tps) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21.1) immunoradiometric assay in non small cell lung cancer evaluation.

Authors
Type
Published Article
Journal
The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR)
Publication Date
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
285–289
Identifiers
PMID: 8624791
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

The aim of our work was the evaluation of the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) of two cytokeratinic markers, TPS and CYFRA 21.1, in clinical setting on non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Serum samples were obtained from 148 untreated NSCLC patients, 60 patients with non malignant lung diseases and 100 healthy subjects: TPS and CYFRA 21.1 serum levels were assayed by IRMA methods. Diagnostic performance of the markers was evaluated and the TPS and CYFRA 21.1 distribution analysed according to some different clinical and biological variables as histological subtypes, stage and survival time by using the Mann-Whitney "U"-test. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.54 (80/148), 0.47 (28/60), 0.52 (108/208) and 0.73 (108/148), 0.74 (44/60), and 0.73 (152/208) for TPS and CYFRA 21.1 respectively. CYFRA 21.1 demonstrate a higher sensitivity than TPS in all stages of the disease and in the spinocellular and adenocarcinoma histological subtypes while TPS sensibility is higher in large cell carcinoma. The CYFRA 21.1 specificity is better than TPS probably by reason of its preferential distribution in respiratory epithelium. Both markers serum levels differ significantly between Stage I-II and IV and between Stage I-II-IIIa and IIIb-IV but neither TPS nor CYFRA 21.1 can discriminate Stage IIIa from IIIb. No significant differences were found in the serum expression of the markers by the different histological subtypes. A value of both markers less than the selected cut-off is related to a longer survival of the patients apart from therapy (p < 0.05). Our conclusion supports similar behaviour of these markers in NSCLC and indicates CYFRA 21.1 as the more needed biochemical index to evaluate NSCLC patients.

Statistics

Seen <100 times