Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent at 13-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography substudy from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial.

Authors
  • Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis1
  • van Geuns, Robert Jan
  • Regar, Evelyn
  • van der Giessen, Willem J
  • Kelbæk, Henning
  • Saunamäki, Kari
  • Escaned, Javier
  • Gonzalo, Nieves
  • di Mario, Carlo
  • Borgia, Francesco
  • Nüesch, Eveline
  • García-García, Héctor M
  • Silber, Sigmund
  • Windecker, Stephan
  • Serruys, Patrick W
  • 1 Erasmus Medical Centre, Thoraxcenter, Ba583a, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected] , (Netherlands)
Type
Published Article
Journal
European Heart Journal
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Date
October 2011
Volume
32
Issue
19
Pages
2454–2463
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr182
PMID: 21659439
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

No significant differences in tissue coverage, malapposition, or lumen/stent areas and volumes were detected by OCT between the hydrophilic polymer-coated ZES and the fluoropolymer-coated EES at 13-month follow-up.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times