Affordable Access

Access to the full text

The therapeutic response of ER+/HER2− breast cancers differs according to the molecular Basal or Luminal subtype

Authors
  • Bertucci, François1, 2
  • Finetti, Pascal1
  • Goncalves, Anthony1, 2
  • Birnbaum, Daniel1
  • 1 Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France , Marseille (France)
  • 2 Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France , Marseille (France)
Type
Published Article
Journal
npj Breast Cancer
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK
Publication Date
Mar 06, 2020
Volume
6
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0151-5
Source
Springer Nature
License
Green

Abstract

The genomics-based molecular classifications aim at identifying more homogeneous classes than immunohistochemistry, associated with a more uniform clinical outcome. We conducted an in silico analysis on a meta-dataset including gene expression data from 5342 clinically defined ER+/HER2− breast cancers (BC) and DNA copy number/mutational and proteomic data. We show that the Basal (16%) versus Luminal (74%) subtypes as defined using the 80-gene signature differ in terms of response/vulnerability to systemic therapies of BC. The Basal subtype is associated with better chemosensitivity, lesser benefit from adjuvant hormone therapy, and likely better sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, platinum salts and immune therapy, and other targeted therapies under development such as FGFR inhibitors. The Luminal subtype displays potential better sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors and vulnerability to targeted therapies such as PIK3CA, AR and Bcl-2 inhibitors. Expression profiles are very different, showing an intermediate position of the ER+/HER2− Basal subtype between the ER+/HER2− Luminal and ER− Basal subtypes, and let suggest a different cell-of-origin. Our data suggest that the ER+/HER2− Basal and Luminal subtypes should not be assimilated and treated as a homogeneous group.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times