Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process.

Authors
  • Strech, D1
  • Bein, S2
  • Brumhard, M3
  • Eisenmenger, W4
  • Glinicke, C5
  • Herbst, T6
  • Jahns, R7
  • von Kielmansegg, S8
  • Schmidt, G9
  • Taupitz, J10
  • Tröger, H D11
  • 1 Hannover Medical School (MHH), Institute for History, Ethics, and Philosophy of Medicine, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 University of Duisburg-Essen, Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, Germany.
  • 3 University of Gießen, Research Ethics Committee, Germany.
  • 4 Ludwig Maximilians Universität München (LMU), Ethics Committee, Germany.
  • 5 University of Kiel, Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, Germany.
  • 6 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Faculty of Law, Germany.
  • 7 University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Interdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data Wuerzburg (ibdw), Germany.
  • 8 University of Kiel, Chair of Public and Medical Law, Germany.
  • 9 Technische Universität München (TUM), University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany.
  • 10 University of Mannheim, Professorship for Civil Law, Law of Civil Procedure, Private International Law and Comparative Law, Germany.
  • 11 Hannover Medical School (MHH), Research Ethics Committee, Germany.
Type
Published Article
Journal
European journal of medical genetics
Publication Date
June 2016
Volume
59
Issue
6-7
Pages
295–309
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002
PMID: 27130428
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times