Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Systematic comparative analysis of single-nucleotide variant detection methods from single-cell RNA sequencing data

Authors
  • Liu, Fenglin1
  • Zhang, Yuanyuan1
  • Zhang, Lei1
  • Li, Ziyi1
  • Fang, Qiao1
  • Gao, Ranran1
  • Zhang, Zemin1, 1
  • 1 Peking University, Beijing, China , Beijing (China)
Type
Published Article
Publication Date
Nov 19, 2019
Volume
20
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1863-4
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundSystematic interrogation of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) is one of the most promising approaches to delineate the cellular heterogeneity and phylogenetic relationships at the single-cell level. While SNV detection from abundant single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is applicable and cost-effective in identifying expressed variants, inferring sub-clones, and deciphering genotype-phenotype linkages, there is a lack of computational methods specifically developed for SNV calling in scRNA-seq. Although variant callers for bulk RNA-seq have been sporadically used in scRNA-seq, the performances of different tools have not been assessed.ResultsHere, we perform a systematic comparison of seven tools including SAMtools, the GATK pipeline, CTAT, FreeBayes, MuTect2, Strelka2, and VarScan2, using both simulation and scRNA-seq datasets, and identify multiple elements influencing their performance. While the specificities are generally high, with sensitivities exceeding 90% for most tools when calling homozygous SNVs in high-confident coding regions with sufficient read depths, such sensitivities dramatically decrease when calling SNVs with low read depths, low variant allele frequencies, or in specific genomic contexts. SAMtools shows the highest sensitivity in most cases especially with low supporting reads, despite the relatively low specificity in introns or high-identity regions. Strelka2 shows consistently good performance when sufficient supporting reads are provided, while FreeBayes shows good performance in the cases of high variant allele frequencies.ConclusionsWe recommend SAMtools, Strelka2, FreeBayes, or CTAT, depending on the specific conditions of usage. Our study provides the first benchmarking to evaluate the performances of different SNV detection tools for scRNA-seq data.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times