Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community

Authors
  • Tinnell, Teresa L.1
  • Ralston, Patricia A. S.2
  • Tretter, Thomas R.1
  • Mills, Mary E.1
  • 1 University of Louisville, Middle and Secondary Department, College of Education and Human Development, Louisville, USA , Louisville (United States)
  • 2 University of Louisville, Department of Engineering Fundamentals, J. B. Speed School of Engineering, Louisville, USA , Louisville (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
International Journal of STEM Education
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Publication Date
Aug 13, 2019
Volume
6
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundThe necessity of a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) literate population continues to be a high priority worldwide. One approach to build and bolster a STEM-literate workforce is to explore approaches for strengthening the teaching of college-level STEM courses. The use of collaborative student learning pedagogy is broadly accepted as an effective approach to improve student learning outcomes over traditional methods, such as lecture. How to encourage and sustain the use of such evidence-based teaching practices in STEM fields is a critical topic. To achieve pedagogical change among college faculty, research supports a faculty learning community (FLC) structure. FLCs are a way to facilitate deeper understanding of a topic within a community of practice. Of particular interest for this paper is whether any FLC-supported pedagogical change was sustained by the faculty after the FLC ended and if so why.ResultsEngineering faculty found success in implementing paradigmatic pedagogical changes by engaging in an FLC that intentionally provided structures to promote a community of practice. This paper reports on the endurance of these pedagogical changes up to 2 years following conclusion of the FLC, with evidence summarizing reasons why many of the faculty had absorbed much of the once-new pedagogical approaches into their ongoing practices.ConclusionsFLC structures that faculty credit to their pedagogical change and the enduring impacts of those changes are described. These results offer evidence that it is possible to structure faculty support for them to make enduring pedagogical change, rather than temporary or one-time changes as part of a particular initiative. The findings, discussion, and conclusions of this study are likely to be of interest to faculty developers, innovative university leadership, or faculty exploring ways of sustaining a pedagogical change.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times