Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Subject-Specific Calculation of Left Atrial Appendage Blood-Borne Particle Residence Time Distribution in Atrial Fibrillation

Authors
  • Sanatkhani, Soroosh1
  • Nedios, Sotirios2, 3, 4
  • Menon, Prahlad G.1
  • Bollmann, Andreas3
  • Hindricks, Gerhard3
  • Shroff, Sanjeev G.1
  • 1 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA , (United States)
  • 2 Department of Electrophysiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA , (United States)
  • 3 Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig , (Germany)
  • 4 Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht , (Netherlands)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Publication Date
May 11, 2021
Volume
12
Identifiers
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.633135
Source
Frontiers
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Physiology
  • Original Research
License
Green

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia that leads to thrombus formation, mostly in the left atrial appendage (LAA). The current standard of stratifying stroke risk, based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score, does not consider LAA morphology, and the clinically accepted LAA morphology-based classification is highly subjective. The aim of this study was to determine whether LAA blood-borne particle residence time distribution and the proposed quantitative index of LAA 3D geometry can add independent information to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Data were collected from 16 AF subjects. Subject-specific measurements included left atrial (LA) and LAA 3D geometry obtained by cardiac computed tomography, cardiac output, and heart rate. We quantified 3D LAA appearance in terms of a novel LAA appearance complexity index (LAA-ACI). We employed computational fluid dynamics analysis and a systems-based approach to quantify residence time distribution and associated calculated variable (LAA mean residence time, tm) in each subject. The LAA-ACI captured the subject-specific LAA 3D geometry in terms of a single number. LAA tm varied significantly within a given LAA morphology as defined by the current subjective method and it was not simply a reflection of LAA geometry/appearance. In addition, LAA-ACI and LAA tm varied significantly for a given CHA2DS2-VASc score, indicating that these two indices of stasis are not simply a reflection of the subjects' clinical status. We conclude that LAA-ACI and LAA tm add independent information to the CHA2DS2-VASc score about stasis risk and thereby can potentially enhance its ability to stratify stroke risk in AF patients.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times