Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Special Education Representation Trends Vary by Language Status: Evidence of Underrepresentation in Tennessee.

Authors
  • Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette1
  • Oh, Min Hyun2
  • Luk, Gigi3
  • Rollins, Adam4
  • 1 Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • 2 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
  • 3 McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. , (Canada)
  • 4 Tennessee Department of Education, Nashville, USA.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of learning disabilities
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2024
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
153–167
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1177/00222194231178285
PMID: 37309592
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Using U.S. state-level data, we report unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio of special education (SPED) trends in Tennessee from 2009 to 2019 for students in Grades 3 to 8 by three language groups: native English speakers (NES), English-proficient bilinguals (EPB), and Current English learners (Current EL). We report trends across all SPED disability categories and across five prevalent disability categories (specific learning disability, specific language impairment, intellectual disability, other health impairments, and autism). The cross-sectional analytic sample included 812,783 students from 28 districts that met the SPED risk ratio threshold set by the state. Results revealed that, compared with NES students, both EPB and Current EL students were generally less likely to receive SPED services, suggesting evidence of language status disparities in SPED representation. Furthermore, findings varied depending on whether adjustments were made to generate odds ratios, especially for higher-incidence disabilities (specific learning disability, specific language impairment, and intellectual disability). Finally, the most severe evidence of underrepresentation was in lower-incidence disabilities (other health impairments and autism). Our results underscore the need for further examination into low rates of SPED identification among learners whose first language is not English (EPB and Current EL). We discuss the contextualized research, practice, and policy implications of our findings.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times