Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Solving for multi-class using orthogonal coding matrices

Authors
  • Mills, Peter1
  • 1 1 , Cumberland (Canada)
Type
Published Article
Journal
SN Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Publication Date
Oct 21, 2019
Volume
1
Issue
11
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-1437-9
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

A common method of generalizing binary to multi-class classification is the error correcting code (ECC). ECCs may be optimized in a number of ways, for instance by making them orthogonal. Here we test two types of orthogonal ECCs on seven different datasets using three types of binary classifier and compare them with three other multi-class methods: 1 versus 1, one-versus-the-rest and random ECCs. The first type of orthogonal ECC, in which the codes contain no zeros, admits a fast and simple method of solving for the probabilities. Orthogonal ECCs are always more accurate than random ECCs as predicted by recent literature. Improvments in uncertainty coefficient (U.C.) range between 0.4 and 17.5% (0.004ā€“0.139, absolute), while improvements in Brier score between 0.7 and 10.7%. Unfortunately, orthogonal ECCs are rarely more accurate than 1 versus 1. Disparities are worst when the methods are paired with logistic regression, with orthogonal ECCs never beating 1 versus 1. When the methods are paired with SVM, the losses are less significant, peaking at 1.5%, relative, 0.011 absolute in uncertainty coefficient and 6.5% in Brier scores. Orthogonal ECCs are always the fastest of the five multi-class methods when paired with linear classifiers. When paired with a piecewise linear classifier, whose classification speed does not depend on the number of training samples, classifications using orthogonal ECCs were always more accurate than the other methods and also faster than 1 versus 1. Losses against 1 versus 1 here were higher, peaking at 1.9% (0.017, absolute), in U.C. and 39% in Brier score. Gains in speed ranged between 1.1% and over 100%. Whether the speed increase is worth the penalty in accuracy will depend on the application.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times