Affordable Access

Access to the full text

“Setting people up for success and then failure” – health care and service providers’ experiences of using prize-based contingency management

Authors
  • Gagnon, Marilou1
  • Guta, Adrian2
  • Payne, Alayna1
  • 1 University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada , Victoria (Canada)
  • 2 University of Windsor, 167 Ferry Street, Windsor, ON, N9A 0C5, V6T2B5, Canada , Windsor (Canada)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Publisher
Springer Nature
Publication Date
Sep 14, 2020
Volume
15
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13011-020-00316-z
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundOver the last 50 years, there has been a growing interest in and use of contingency management (CM) for people who use substances. Yet, despite showing some level of efficacy (albeit only short-term) and being praised by researchers as beneficial and cost-saving, it continues to be underutilized by health care and service providers. Why that is remains unclear.MethodsRecognizing a gap, we conducted a targeted analysis of a larger set of qualitative interviews conducted on the experience of health care and service providers with incentives (including prize-based CM) (n = 25).ResultsFour themes were identified during the analysis: 1) The specificities of prize-based CM, 2) The role of providers in administering prize-based CM, 3) The positive and negative impact on the relationship, and 4) The ethical concerns arising from prize-based CM. Overall, our findings are consistent with existing literature and suggest that providers are wary of using prize-based CM because they tend to value effort over success, support over reward, honesty over deceit, and certainty over probability and variability.ConclusionOur analysis offers additional insights into the experiences of providers who use prize-based CM and possibly some indications as to why they may not wish to work with this type of incentive. The question raised here is not whether there is enough evidence on the effectiveness of prize-based CM, but rather if this type of incentive is appropriate and ethical when caring for people who use substances.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times