Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Serum betaine but not choline is inversely associated with breast cancer risk: a case–control study in China

Authors
  • Du, Yu-Feng1
  • Lin, Fang-Yu2
  • Long, Wei-Qing3
  • Luo, Wei-Ping1
  • Yan, Bo1
  • Xu, Ming1
  • Mo, Xiong-Fei4
  • Zhang, Cai-Xia1
  • 1 Sun Yat-sen University, Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, 74 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China , Guangzhou (China)
  • 2 The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Nursing Department, Guangzhou, 510080, China , Guangzhou (China)
  • 3 The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou, 510080, China , Guangzhou (China)
  • 4 The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Department of Vascular Surgery, Guangzhou, 510080, China , Guangzhou (China)
Type
Published Article
Journal
European Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Publication Date
Feb 20, 2016
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
1329–1337
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-016-1183-3
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

PurposeCholine and betaine are important for DNA methylation and synthesis, and may affect tumor carcinogenesis. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the association between serum choline and betaine and breast cancer risk. This study aimed to examine whether serum choline and betaine were inversely associated with breast cancer risk among Chinese women.MethodsThis hospital-based case–control study consecutively recruited 510 breast cancer cases and 518 frequency-matched (age and residence) controls, and blood samples were available for 500 cases and 500 controls. Serum choline and betaine were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Multiple unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsAn inverse association with breast cancer risk was observed for serum betaine (fourth vs first quartile adjusted OR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.47–0.97) and for the ratio of serum betaine to choline (fourth vs first quartile adjusted OR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.48–1.00), but not for serum choline (fourth vs first quartile adjusted OR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.56–1.15). Serum betaine was inversely associated with breast cancer risk in subjects with below-median dietary folate intake (fourth vs first quartile adjusted OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.30–0.77).ConclusionsThis study suggested that serum betaine but not choline was inversely associated with breast cancer risk. This result needed to be further confirmed by the prospective studies.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times