Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Risk-Induced Trait Responses and Non-consumptive Effects in Plants and Animals in Response to Their Invertebrate Herbivore and Parasite Natural Enemies

Authors
  • Koprivnikar, Janet1
  • Rochette, Alicia2
  • Forbes, Mark R.2
  • 1 Department of Chemistry and Biology, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON , (Canada)
  • 2 Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON , (Canada)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Publication Date
Jun 14, 2021
Volume
9
Identifiers
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.667030
Source
Frontiers
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Review
License
Green

Abstract

Predators kill and consume prey, but also scare living prey. Fitness of prey can be reduced by direct killing and consumption, but also by non-consumptive effects (NCEs) if prey show costly risk-induced trait responses (RITRs) to predators, which are meant to reduce predation risk. Recently, similarities between predators and parasites as natural enemies have been recognized, including their potential to cause victim RITRs and NCEs. However, plant-herbivore and animal host-parasite associations might be more comparable as victim-enemy systems in this context than either is to prey-predator systems. This is because plant herbivores and animal parasites are often invertebrate species that are typically smaller than their victims, generally cause lower lethality, and allow for further defensive responses by victims after consumption begins. Invertebrate herbivores can cause diverse RITRs in plants through various means, and animals also exhibit assorted RITRs to increased parasitism risk. This synthesis aims to broadly compare these two enemy-victim systems by highlighting the ways in which plants and animals perceive threat and respond with a range of induced victim trait responses that can provide pre-emptive defense against invertebrate enemies. We also review evidence that RITRs are costly in terms of reducing victim fitness or abundance, demonstrating how work with one victim-enemy system can inform the other with respect to the frequency and magnitude of RITRs and possible NCEs. We particularly highlight gaps in our knowledge about plant and animal host responses to their invertebrate enemies that may guide directions for future research. Comparing how potential plant and animal victims respond pre-emptively to the threat of consumption via RITRs will help to advance our understanding of natural enemy ecology and may have utility for pest and disease control.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times