Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

If the results of an article are noteworthy, read the entire article; do not rely on the abstract alone.

Authors
  • Dal-Ré, R1
  • Castell, M V2
  • García-Puig, J3
  • 1 Investigación Clínica, Programa BUC (Biociencias UAM + CSIC), Centro de Excelencia Internacional, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 Centro de Salud Dr. Castroviejo, DA Norte, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España.
  • 3 Unidad Metabólico Vascular, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Revista clinica espanola
Publication Date
Nov 01, 2015
Volume
215
Issue
8
Pages
454–457
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.rce.2015.05.004
PMID: 26165166
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
Spanish
License
Unknown

Abstract

Clinicians typically update their knowledge by reading articles on the Internet. Easy access to the articles' abstracts and a lack of time to access other information sources creates a risk that therapeutic or diagnostic decisions will be made after reading just the abstracts. Occasionally, however, the abstracts of articles from clinical trials that have not obtained statistically significant differences in the primary study endpoint have reported other positive results, for example, of a secondary endpoint or a subgroup analysis. The article, however, correctly reports all results, including those of the primary endpoint. In the abstract, the safety information of the experimental treatment is usually deficient. The whole article should be read if a clinical decision is to be made. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times