Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Research trends on platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002-2021: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.

Authors
  • Lai, Honghao1, 2, 3
  • Chen, Guangping1
  • Zhang, Wei2
  • Wu, Guosheng2
  • Xia, Zhaofan1, 2
  • 1 Department of Burn, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. , (China)
  • 2 Department of Burn Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. , (China)
  • 3 Research Institute, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. , (China)
Type
Published Article
Journal
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2023
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1882–1892
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14047
PMID: 36480439
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related to PRP in the treatment of wounds and explore the research status, hotspots and frontiers in this field in recent 20 years. Studies about PRP treatment for wounds from 2002 to 2021 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) of Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualisation softwares such as VOSviewer and SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace were used to analyse the research trends and features. A total of 1748 studies were identified in the SCI-Expanded from 2002 to 2021. The number of publications on PRP in the treatment of wounds has shown an increasing trend, from 6 (in 2002) to 228 (in 2021). The papers published in the United States have led in times cited (14637) and H-index (63). Though Italy was slightly lower than China in the number of publications, the H-index and average cited (47, 28.45) were higher than that of China (38, 27.01). The strongest keyword was "fibrin" (strength = 13.07), and the longest burst duration keyword was "thrombin" (began in 2002 and ended in 2014). The largest 10 co-citation clusters are as follows: endothelial cell proliferation (#0), regenerative medicine-associated treatment (#1), diabetic wound healing (#2), autologous derived (#3), platelet-rich fibrin (#4), tissue engineering (#5), regenerative potential (#6), clinical randomised trial (#7), histologic observation (#8), and wound bacteria (#9). The United States has made the most outstanding contribution in this field. Chinese researchers need to enhance the quality of publications further. Wound Repair Regen. is the most noteworthy journal. The mechanism of growth factors of PRP, combination therapy, preparation of PRP, and related clinical trials may be topics that need attention. © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times