"Repressed Memory" Makes No Sense.
- Authors
- Type
- Published Article
- Journal
- Topics in cognitive science
- Publication Date
- Oct 01, 2024
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 616–629
- Identifiers
- DOI: 10.1111/tops.12677
- PMID: 37335986
- Source
- Medline
- Keywords
- Language
- English
- License
- Unknown
Abstract
The expression "repressed memory" was introduced over 100 years ago as a theoretical term purportedly referring to an unobservable psychological entity postulated by Freud's seduction theory. That theory, however, and its hypothesized cognitive architecture, have been thoroughly debunked-yet the term "repressed memory" seems to remain. In this paper, I offer a philosophical evaluation of the meaning of this theoretical term as well as an argument to question its scientific status by comparing it to other cases of theoretical terms that have either survived scientific change-such as "atom" or "gene"-or that have perished, such as "black bile." Ultimately, I argue that "repressed memory" is more like "black bile" than "atom" or "gene" and, thus, recommend its demotion from our scientific vocabulary. © 2023 Cognitive Science Society LLC.
