Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Reliability of streetscape audits comparing on‐street and online observations: MAPS-Global in 5 countries

Authors
  • Queralt, Ana1, 2
  • Molina-García, Javier2
  • Terrón-Pérez, Marta1, 2
  • Cerin, Ester3, 4
  • Barnett, Anthony3
  • Timperio, Anna5
  • Veitch, Jenny5
  • Reis, Rodrigo6
  • Silva, Alexandre Augusto Paula7, 8
  • Ghekiere, Ariane9, 10, 11
  • Van Dyck, Delfien11, 9
  • Conway, Terry L.12
  • Cain, Kelli L.3, 12
  • Geremia, Carrie M.12
  • Sallis, James F.3, 12
  • 1 University of Valencia, Jaume Roig s/n, Valencia, 46010, Spain , Valencia (Spain)
  • 2 University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain , Valencia (Spain)
  • 3 Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia , Melbourne (Australia)
  • 4 The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China , Hong Kong (China)
  • 5 Deakin University, Geelong, Australia , Geelong (Australia)
  • 6 Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA , St. Louis (United States)
  • 7 Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil , Curitiba (Brazil)
  • 8 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil , Curitiba (Brazil)
  • 9 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium , Ghent (Belgium)
  • 10 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium , Brussels (Belgium)
  • 11 Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium , Brussels (Belgium)
  • 12 University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA , San Diego (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
International Journal of Health Geographics
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Jan 28, 2021
Volume
20
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12942-021-00261-5
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundMicroscale environmental features are usually evaluated using direct on-street observations. This study assessed inter-rater reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes, Global version (MAPS-Global), in an international context, comparing on-street with more efficient online observation methods in five countries with varying levels of walkability.MethodsData were collected along likely walking routes of study participants, from residential starting points toward commercial clusters in Melbourne (Australia), Ghent (Belgium), Curitiba (Brazil), Hong Kong (China), and Valencia (Spain). In-person on the street and online using Google Street View audits were carried out by two independent trained raters in each city. The final sample included 349 routes, 1228 street segments, 799 crossings, and 16 cul-de-sacs. Inter-rater reliability analyses were performed using Kappa statistics or Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC).ResultsOverall mean assessment times were the same for on-street and online evaluations (22 ± 12 min). Only a few subscales had Kappa or ICC values < 0.70, with aesthetic and social environment variables having the lowest overall reliability values, though still in the “good to excellent” category. Overall scores for each section (route, segment, crossing) showed good to excellent reliability (ICCs: 0.813, 0.929 and 0.885, respectively), and the MAPS-Global grand score had excellent reliability (ICC: 0.861) between the two methods.ConclusionsMAPS-Global is a feasible and reliable instrument that can be used both on-street and online to analyze microscale environmental characteristics in diverse international urban settings.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times