Rectal prolapse surgery in males and females: An ACS NSQIP-based comparative analysis of over 12,000 patients.
- Authors
- Type
- Published Article
- Journal
- American journal of surgery
- Publication Date
- Sep 01, 2020
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 697–705
- Identifiers
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.017
- PMID: 31987495
- Source
- Medline
- Keywords
- Language
- English
- License
- Unknown
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is relatively uncommon in male patients. The aim of this study was to compare males and females who underwent rectal prolapse surgery. Retrospective analysis of the ACS NSQIP public use file. Among 12,220 patients, 978 (8%) were male and 11,242 (92%) were female. Males were younger, 56 (38-73) vs. 71 (58-83) years, less often white (83% vs. 71%), had lower ASA scores, and underwent more laparoscopic (33% vs. 27%), more open (33% vs. 29%), and less perineal (33% vs 44%) procedures (all p < 0.05). Morbidity (9.9% vs. 10.0%), reoperation (3.4% vs. 3.1%), and readmission (5.7% vs. 6.0%) were not different for males and females. In subgroup analysis by surgical procedure type, there remained no outcome differences. Propensity matched analysis revealed no difference in the use of laparoscopic, open, or perineal procedures. Males with rectal prolapse are younger, have a different racial distribution, a lower surgical risk profile, and undergo different surgical procedures than females, which appears to be driven by patient age and surgical risk assessment. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
