Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

A randomized, double-blind comparison of the effectiveness of environmental cleaning between infection control professionals and environmental service workers.

Authors
  • Xu, Hong1
  • Jin, Hui1
  • Zhao, Lan2
  • Wei, Xiaojun2
  • Hu, Liangen1
  • Shen, Linhai1
  • Wei, Lingya1
  • Xie, Lijun2
  • Kong, Qingxin1
  • Wang, Yinghong1
  • Ni, Xiaoping3
  • 1 Department of Disinfection Surveillance and Vector Control, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China. , (China)
  • 2 Department of Infection Control, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China. , (China)
  • 3 Department of Disinfection Surveillance and Vector Control, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China. Electronic address: [email protected] , (China)
Type
Published Article
Journal
American journal of infection control
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2015
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
292–294
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.009
PMID: 25556049
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

The hospital environment is a reservoir for pathogens, and environmental service workers (ESWs) play an important role in infection prevention. A randomized, double-blind comparison was carried out in a 23-bed intensive care unit of a traditional Chinese medical-Western medical hospital. Aerobic colony counts (ACC) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were used to compare the effectiveness of environmental cleaning between infection control professionals and ESWs. The results suggest that high-touch surfaces around MRSA patients are often not sufficiently cleaned and are even cross-contaminated by ESWs after cleaning. Further educational intervention is needed for improvement of environmental cleaning.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times