Affordable Access

Quotation accuracy: fact or fiction?

Authors
Type
Published Article
Journal
Israel journal of medical sciences
Publication Date
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
465–470
Identifiers
PMID: 1506172
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

Results from original studies are not always correctly represented in subsequent medical publications. In this study, randomly selected quotations from Israeli medical journals were examined. Less than 80% of the examined statements were in complete agreement with the original source. In about 7% the cited reference failed to substantiate the previous author's statement. Similar results were found over a range of American and European general and speciality journals. It is concluded that errors in quotation are a widespread problem in the biomedical literature. Editors and peer reviewers can improve quotation accuracy by stressing this issue in decisions regarding publication. Nevertheless, it seems that the most efficient solution would be for authors to increase their vigilance in accurately quoting results and statements from previous publications.

Statistics

Seen <100 times