Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Psychometric assessment of the short-form Child Perceptions Questionnaire: an international collaborative study.

Authors
  • Thomson, W M1
  • Foster Page, L A2
  • Robinson, P G3
  • Do, L G4
  • Traebert, J5
  • Mohamed, A R6
  • Turton, B J7
  • McGrath, C8
  • Bekes, K9
  • Hirsch, C10
  • Del Carmen Aguilar-Diaz, F11
  • Marshman, Z12
  • Benson, P E12
  • Baker, S R12
  • 1 Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. [email protected] , (New Zealand)
  • 2 Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. , (New Zealand)
  • 3 School of Oral and Dental Sciences, The University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • 4 Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 5 Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Tubarao, Brazil. , (Brazil)
  • 6 Department of Dental Services, Ministry of Health, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. , (Brunei)
  • 7 Department of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. , (Cambodia)
  • 8 Periodontology & Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. , (Hong Kong SAR China)
  • 9 Department of Paediatric Dentistry, University Dental Clinic, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. , (Austria)
  • 10 Department of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. , (Germany)
  • 11 Department of Public Health, National Autonomous University of Mexico León Unit, León, Guanajuato, México. , (Mexico)
  • 12 School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2016
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
549–556
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12248
PMID: 27477903
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

The CPQ11-14 performed well cross-sectionally in the largest analysis of the scale in the literature to date, with robust and mostly consistent psychometric characteristics, albeit with two underlying factors (rather than the originally hypothesized four-factor structure). It appears to be a sound, robust measure which should be useful for research, practice and policy.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times