Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Prognostic Significance of ARID1A Expression Patterns Varies with Molecular Subtype in Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors
  • Kim, Jun Yong1
  • Park, Cheol Keun1
  • Noh, Songmi2
  • Cheong, Jae-Ho3
  • Noh, Sung Hoon3
  • Kim, Hyunki1
  • 1 Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. , (North Korea)
  • 2 Department of Pathology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea. , (North Korea)
  • 3 Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. , (North Korea)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Gut and liver
Publication Date
Sep 15, 2023
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
753–765
Identifiers
DOI: 10.5009/gnl220342
PMID: 36789575
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A) is frequently mutated in gastric cancer (GC), especially Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated and microsatellite instability high GC. The loss of ARID1A expression has been reported as a poor prognostic marker in GC. However, the relationships between ARID1A alteration and EBV-associated and microsatellite instability high GC, which are known to have a favorable prognosis, has hampered proper evaluation of the prognostic significance of ARID1A expression in GC. We aimed to analyze the true prognostic significance of ARID1A expression by correcting confounding variables. We evaluated the ARID1A expression in a large series (n=1,032) of advanced GC and analyzed the relationships between expression pattern and variable parameters, including clinicopathologic factors, key molecular features such as EBV-positivity, mismatch repair protein deficiency, and expression of p53 and several receptor tyrosine kinases including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor. Survival analysis of the molecular subtypes was done according to the ARID1A expression patterns. Loss of ARID1A expression was found in 52.5% (53/101) of mutL homolog 1 (MLH1)-deficient and 35.8% (24/67) of EBV-positive GCs, compared with only 9.6% (82/864) of the MLH1-proficient and EBV-negative group (p<0.001). The loss of ARID1A expression was associated only with MLH1 deficiency and EBV positivity. On survival analysis, the loss of ARID1A expression was associated with worse prognosis only in MLH1-proficient and EBV-negative GC. Multivariate analysis revealed that both loss of ARID1A and decreased ARID1A expression were independent worse prognostic factors in patients with advanced GC. Only in MLH1-proficient and EBV-negative GC, the loss of ARID1A expression is related to poorer prognosis.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times