Affordable Access

Proficiency testing for laboratories performing fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes.

Authors
  • Mascarello, James T
  • Brothman, Arthur R
  • Davison, Keri
  • Dewald, Gordon W
  • Herrman, Marille
  • McCandless, Danette
  • Park, Jonathan P
  • Persons, Diane L
  • Rao, Kathleen W
  • Schneider, Nancy R
  • Vance, Gail H
  • Cooley, Linda D
Type
Published Article
Journal
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2002
Volume
126
Issue
12
Pages
1458–1462
Identifiers
PMID: 12456204
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

With the exception of one challenge, at least 80% of the participants reached the correct diagnostic conclusion. In the sole exception, there was still a consensus of 91.7% of participants with the same (albeit erroneous) diagnostic conclusion. The overall outstanding performance of participating laboratories clearly shows the reliability of current FISH methods. Despite the fact that a large number of laboratories reported little or no experience with the specific test systems, the overwhelming majority performed very well. This result shows that the program's strategy of targeting classes of abnormalities (vs a single abnormality associated with a specific disease) did not put at a disadvantage participants who did not routinely perform all of the potential tests in the class. The extraordinary variation in ISCN descriptions submitted by participants showed that the existing system for human cytogenetic nomenclature is not suitable for facile communication of FISH test results.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times