Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Positive natural selection in primate genes of the type I interferon response

Authors
  • Judd, Elena N.1
  • Gilchrist, Alison R.1
  • Meyerson, Nicholas R.1
  • Sawyer, Sara L.1
  • 1 University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA , Boulder (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Apr 26, 2021
Volume
21
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01783-z
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundThe Type I interferon response is an important first-line defense against viruses. In turn, viruses antagonize (i.e., degrade, mis-localize, etc.) many proteins in interferon pathways. Thus, hosts and viruses are locked in an evolutionary arms race for dominance of the Type I interferon pathway. As a result, many genes in interferon pathways have experienced positive natural selection in favor of new allelic forms that can better recognize viruses or escape viral antagonists. Here, we performed a holistic analysis of selective pressures acting on genes in the Type I interferon family. We initially hypothesized that the genes responsible for inducing the production of interferon would be antagonized more heavily by viruses than genes that are turned on as a result of interferon. Our logic was that viruses would have greater effect if they worked upstream of the production of interferon molecules because, once interferon is produced, hundreds of interferon-stimulated proteins would activate and the virus would need to counteract them one-by-one.ResultsWe curated multiple sequence alignments of primate orthologs for 131 genes active in interferon production and signaling (herein, “induction” genes), 100 interferon-stimulated genes, and 100 randomly chosen genes. We analyzed each multiple sequence alignment for the signatures of recurrent positive selection. Counter to our hypothesis, we found the interferon-stimulated genes, and not interferon induction genes, are evolving significantly more rapidly than a random set of genes. Interferon induction genes evolve in a way that is indistinguishable from a matched set of random genes (22% and 18% of genes bear signatures of positive selection, respectively). In contrast, interferon-stimulated genes evolve differently, with 33% of genes evolving under positive selection and containing a significantly higher fraction of codons that have experienced selection for recurrent replacement of the encoded amino acid.ConclusionViruses may antagonize individual products of the interferon response more often than trying to neutralize the system altogether.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times