Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.

Authors
  • Kassin, Saul M1
  • Drizin, Steven A
  • Grisso, Thomas
  • Gudjonsson, Gisli H
  • Leo, Richard A
  • Redlich, Allison D
  • 1 John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. [email protected]
Type
Published Article
Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Publication Date
February 2010
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
3–38
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
PMID: 19603261
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

Recent DNA exonerations have shed light on the problem that people sometimes confess to crimes they did not commit. Drawing on police practices, laws concerning the admissibility of confession evidence, core principles of psychology, and forensic studies involving multiple methodologies, this White Paper summarizes what is known about police-induced confessions. In this review, we identify suspect characteristics (e.g., adolescence; intellectual disability; mental illness; and certain personality traits), interrogation tactics (e.g., excessive interrogation time; presentations of false evidence; and minimization), and the phenomenology of innocence (e.g., the tendency to waive Miranda rights) that influence confessions as well as their effects on judges and juries. This article concludes with a strong recommendation for the mandatory electronic recording of interrogations and considers other possibilities for the reform of interrogation practices and the protection of vulnerable suspect populations.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times