Affordable Access

Perimetric follow-up in glaucoma with a reduced set of test points.

Authors
  • Weber, J
  • Diestelhorst, M
Type
Published Article
Journal
German journal of ophthalmology
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1992
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
409–414
Identifiers
PMID: 1490140
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

The global mean defect (GM) is probably the most useful visual field index for glaucoma follow-up. We compared 50 regional subsets of test locations to estimate the GM. Using the data on 424 automated fields of 257 patients with either primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, we calculated the partial sample error of the regional mean defect as compared with the GM. In many regions, the measured sample error was greater than expected for a representative sample of points. Some sample errors were up to 5 times larger (regions "upper hemifield" and "lower hemifield"). Only a few subsets proved to be representative of the whole field, namely, regions "ring 3" (10 degrees-15 degrees), "ring 4" (15 degrees-20 degrees) and "ring 5" (20 degrees-25 degrees). The use of such programs for follow-up is very accurate for staging. Moreover, theoretical calculations reveal that trend analysis is even more significant if the reduction in examination time is combined with a proportional increase in examination frequency.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times