Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Patterns of surveillance for colorectal cancer: Experience from a single large tertiary institution.

  • Pellegrino, Samantha A1
  • Chan, Steven2
  • Simons, Koen3, 4
  • Kinsella, Rita5
  • Gibbs, Peter6, 7
  • Faragher, Ian G1, 2
  • Deftereos, Irene8
  • Yeung, Justin Mc1, 2, 9
  • 1 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 2 Department of Surgery, Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 3 Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne school of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 4 Office for Research, Western Health, St Albans, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 5 Department of Physiotherapy, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 6 Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, St Albans, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 7 The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 8 Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Western Health, Footscray, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 9 Western Health Chronic Disease Alliance, Western Health, St Albans, Australia. , (Australia)
Published Article
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology
Publication Date
Oct 20, 2020
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13483
PMID: 33079492


Colorectal cancer surveillance is an essential part of care and should include clinical review and follow-up investigations. There is limited information regarding postoperative surveillance and survivorship care in the Australian context. This study investigated patterns of colorectal cancer surveillance at a large tertiary institution. A retrospective review of hospital records was conducted for all patients treated with curative surgery between January 2012 and June 2017. Provision of clinical surveillance, colonoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) within 24 months postoperatively were recorded. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate time-to-surveillance review and associated investigations. A total of 675 patients were included in the study. Median time to first postoperative clinical review was 20 days (95% confidence interval (CI), 18-21) with only 31% of patients having their first postoperative clinic review within 2 weeks. Median time to first CEA was 100 days (95% CI, 92-109), with 47% of patients having their CEA checked within the first 3 months, increasing to 68% at 6 months. Median time to first follow-up CT scan was 262 days (95% CI, 242-278) and for colonoscopy, 560 days (95% CI, 477-625). Poor uptake of surveillance testing was more prevalent in patients from older age groups, those with multiple comorbidities, and higher stage cancers. Colorectal cancer surveillance is multi-disciplinary and involves several parallel processes, many of which lead to inconsistent follow-up. Further prospective work is required to identify the reasons for variation in care and which aspects are most important to cancer patients. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times