Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and provider assessment in mental health: a systematic review of the context of implementation.

Authors
  • Roe, David1, 2, 3
  • Mazor, Yael1, 2
  • Gelkopf, Marc1, 2
  • 1 Department of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838 Israe.
  • 2 Center for Community Mental Health, Research, Practice and Policy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel. , (Israel)
  • 3 Department of Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry, Aalborg University, Denmark. , (Denmark)
Type
Published Article
Journal
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Publication Date
Mar 05, 2021
Volume
33
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz084
PMID: 31725153
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

To review and integrate the vast amount of literature yielded by recent growing interest in patient-reported outcome measurement and routine outcome measures (PROMs/ROMs), in order to suggest options and improvements for implementation. PROMs are the systematic assessment of service users' health using standardized self-report measures. Specifically, for ROMs, it includes routine provider or caretaker assessment measures. Both are administered to ascertain routinely, the impact of treatment in mental health settings and to improve care. A review is needed because of the large differences in setting, conceptualization, practice and implementation. Here, we examine the different major projects worldwide. Psych INFO and PubMed including Medline, Biomed Central, EMBASE Psychiatry and Elsevier Science's Direct. We conducted a systematized review of the literature published from 2000 to 2018 on the implementation and sustainability of PROMs and ROMs in mental health services for adults. We described and characterized the programs in different countries worldwide. We identified 103 articles that met the inclusion criteria, representing over 80 PROMs/ROMs initiatives in 15 countries. National policy and structure of mental health services were found to be major factors in implementation. We discuss the great variability in PROMs/ROMs models in different countries, making suggestions for their streamlining and improvement. We extracted valuable information on the different characteristics of the numerous PROMs/ROMs initiatives worldwide. However, in the absence of a strong nationwide policy effort and support, implementation seems scattered and irregular. Thus, development of the implementation of PROMs/ROMs is left to groups of enthusiastic clinicians and researchers, making sustainability problematic. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times