Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Past and Future Path of Russian Ethnology: A Personal View in a Global Perspective

Authors
  • Tishkov, V. A.1
  • 1 Miklukho-Maklai Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia , Moscow (Russia)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Pleiades Publishing
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2021
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
118–132
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1134/S101933162102009X
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Review
License
Yellow

Abstract

AbstractAn overview of trends in Russian academic ethnology over the past three decades is provided. This is an analysis of the state of the discipline from the inside, from the point of view of the author, who has been at the center of the scientific and public life of the country for all these years and who, as the director of the RAS Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, influenced academic strategy and institutional changes. This is also a view on Russian national ethnology in the context of epistemological shifts and disciplinary changes that have taken place in world sociocultural anthropology and ethnology. The main provisions of this article concern intradisciplinary inertia and the difficult revision of the Soviet legacy; the restrictive impact of dominant public practices on the choice of metatheoretical constructs such as social constructivism in culturally complex societies; the influence of the ideology and practice of ethno-nationalism on the scientific community and the resultant “postcolonial” or aboriginal anthropology; and the combination of ethnographic tradition and new directions in the search for cultural similarities as the antithesis to the traditional obsession with establishing differences. The article analyzes the nation-building project based on a multiethnic civil nation as one of the prospects for the anthropological vision of Russia and the place of scientists in this project. The author evaluates the post-Soviet period as one of the most fruitful in the history of Russian ethnology in terms of the formation of new trends, thematic repertoire, and geography of research.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times