Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Osteoporosis management in Australian general practice: an analysis of current osteoporosis treatment patterns and gaps in practice

Authors
  • Naik-Panvelkar, Pradnya1
  • Norman, Sarah1
  • Elgebaly, Zain1
  • Elliott, Jeff1
  • Pollack, Allan1
  • Thistlethwaite, Jill1
  • Weston, Clare1
  • Seibel, Markus J.2
  • 1 NPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia , Surry Hills (Australia)
  • 2 The University of Sydney and Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia , Concord (Australia)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Family Practice
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Feb 12, 2020
Volume
21
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01103-2
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundAmong Australians aged 50 and over, an estimated 1 in 4 men and 2 in 5 women will experience a minimal trauma fracture during their remaining lifetime. Effective fracture prevention is hindered by substantial undertreatment, even of patients who clearly warrant pharmacological therapy. Poor adherence to osteoporosis treatment is also a leading cause of repeat fractures and hospitalisation. The aim of this study was to identify current osteoporosis treatment patterns and gaps in practice in Australia, using general practice data, and to explore general practitioners’ (GPs’) attitudes to osteoporosis treatment and their views on patient factors affecting osteoporosis management.MethodsThe study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study which utilised data from MedicineInsight – a national general practice data program that extracts longitudinal, de-identified patient data from clinical information systems (CISs) of participating general practices. Phase 2 included semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews with a sample of MedicineInsight practice GPs. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis method informed by the theory of planned behaviour.ResultsA diagnosis of osteoporosis was recorded in 12.4% of patients over the age of 50 years seen in general practice. Of those diagnosed with osteoporosis, almost a quarter were not prescribed osteoporosis medicines. From 2012 to 17, there was a progressive increase in the number of denosumab prescriptions, while prescriptions for bisphosphonates and other osteoporosis medicines decreased. More than 80% of patients who ceased denosumab treatment had no subsequent bisphosphonate prescription recorded. Interviews with GPs revealed beliefs and attitudes that may have influenced their intentions towards prescribing and osteoporosis management.ConclusionsThis study suggests that within the Australian general practice setting, osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated. In addition, it appears that most patients who ceased denosumab treatment had no record of subsequent antiresorptive therapy, which would place them at risk of further fractures. The study supports the need for the development of clinical education programs addressing GP knowledge gaps and attitudes, and the implementation of specific interventions such as good reminder/recall systems to avoid delays in reviewing and treating patients with osteoporosis.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times