Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

The original risk: overtheologizing ethics and undertheologizing sin.

Authors
  • Müller, Denis
Type
Published Article
Journal
Christian bioethics
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2007
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
7–23
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1080/13803600701283177
PMID: 17453837
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

The project of articulating a theological ethics on the basis of liturgical anthropology is bound to fail if the necessary consequence is that one has to quit the forum of critical modern rationality. The risk of Engelhardt's approach is to limit rationality to a narrow vision of reason. Sin is not to be understood as the negation of human holiness, but as the negation of divine holiness. The only way to renew theological ethics is to understand sin as the anthropological and ethical expression of the biblical message of the justification by faith only. Sin is therefore a secondary category, which can only by interpreted in light of the positive manifestation of liberation, justification, and grace. The central issue of Christian ethics is not ritual purity or morality, but experience, confession and recognition of our own injustice in our dealing with God and men.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times