Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Online Liver Imaging Course; Pivoting to Transform Radiology Education During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

  • Elsayes, Khaled M1
  • Marks, Robert M2
  • Kamel, Serageldin3
  • Towbin, Alexander J4
  • Kielar, Ania Z5
  • Patel, Parth6
  • Chernyak, Victoria7
  • Fowler, Kathryn J8
  • Nassar, Sameh9
  • Soliman, Moataz A10
  • Kamaya, Aya11
  • Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal12
  • Borhani, Amir A10
  • Fetzer, David T13
  • Fung, Alice W14
  • Do, Richard K G15
  • Bashir, Mustafa R16
  • Lee, James17
  • Consul, Nikita18
  • Olmsted, Richard18
  • And 5 more
  • 1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 Naval Medical Center San Diego, CA, and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • 3 Clinical Neurosciences Imaging Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • 4 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio.
  • 5 Department of Radiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. , (Canada)
  • 6 McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas.
  • 7 Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • 8 Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
  • 9 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030.
  • 10 Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • 11 Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
  • 12 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • 13 UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • 14 Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • 15 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • 16 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • 17 Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • 18 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  • 19 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • 20 Department of Radiology/Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • 21 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania.
  • 22 Office of Educational Programs, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas.
Published Article
Academic radiology
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.001
PMID: 33109449


The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has drastically disrupted radiology in-person education. The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of a virtual teaching method using available technology and its role in the continuity of education of practicing radiologists and trainees during the pandemic. The authors created the Online Liver Imaging Course (OLIC) that comprised 28 online comprehensive lectures delivered in real-time and on-demand over six weeks. Radiologists and radiology trainees were asked to register to attend the live sessions. At the end of the course, we conducted a 46-question survey among registrants addressing their training level, perception of virtual conferencing, and evaluation of the course content. One thousand four hundred and thirty four radiologists and trainees completed interest sign up forms before the start of the course with the first webinar having the highest number of live attendees (343 people). On average, there were 89 live participants per session and 750 YouTube views per recording (as of July 9, 2020). After the end of the course, 487 attendees from 37 countries responded to the postcourse survey for an overall response rate of (33%). Approximately (63%) of participants were practicing radiologists while (37%) were either fellows or residents and rarely medical students. The overwhelming majority (97%) found the OLIC webinar series to be beneficial. Essentially all attendees felt that the webinar sessions met (43%) or exceeded (57%) their expectations. When asked about their perception of virtual conferences after attending OLIC lectures, almost all attendees (99%) enjoyed the virtual conference with a majority (61%) of the respondents who enjoyed the virtual format more than in-person conferences, while (38%) enjoyed the webinar format but preferred in-person conferences. When asked about the willingness to attend virtual webinars in the future, (84%) said that they would attend future virtual conferences even if in-person conferences resume while (15%) were unsure. The success of the OLIC, attributed to many factors, indicates that videoconferencing technology provides an inexpensive alternative to in-person radiology conferences. The positive responses to our postcourse survey suggest that virtual education will remain to stay. Educational institutions and scientific societies should foster such models. Copyright © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. All rights reserved.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times