Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

A Nomogram to Predict Intra-Spinal Canal Cement Leakage Among Elderly Patients with Spine Metastases: An Internal-Validated Model

Authors
  • Shi, Xuedong1
  • Cui, Yunpeng1
  • Pan, Yuanxing1
  • Wang, Bing1
  • Lei, Mingxing2, 3
  • 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100032
  • 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, 572013
  • 3 Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853
Type
Published Article
Journal
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Publisher
Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Publication Date
Sep 29, 2021
Volume
16
Pages
1735–1746
Identifiers
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S330783
PMID: 34616147
PMCID: PMC8487801
Source
PubMed Central
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Original Research
License
Unknown

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to assess the risk variables for predicting intra-spinal canal cement leakage, especially among elderly patients with spine metastases after being treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Furthermore, we proposed and validated a nomogram to stratify risks of intra-spinal canal cement leakage. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 163 elderly patients (age ≧65 years) with spine metastases who underwent PVP. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=100) and a validation cohort (n=63). The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen potential risk variables in the training cohort. Significant risk variables were included in the nomogram, and the nomogram was developed according to the estimates of the each included variable. The predictive effectiveness of the nomogram was validated using discrimination and calibration performance. Results The overall prevalence of intra-spinal canal cement leakage was 9.82% (16/163). In the training cohort, female patients (14.71%, 5/34) showed a higher rate of intra-spinal canal cement leakage as compared with male patients (4.55%, 3/66). The nomogram consisted of sex, cortical osteolytic destruction in posterior wall, and load-bearing lines of spine. The nomogram had acceptable discrimination, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.75 in the training cohort, 0.64 in the validation cohort, and 0.69 in the entire cohort, and also showed favorable calibration based on the goodness-of-fit test. According to the nomogram, three risk groups were developed: the low risk group had an actual probability of 7.03%, the medium risk group was 11.54%, and high risk group was 44.44%. The difference between the three groups was significant (P ˂ 0.01). Conclusion Intra-spinal canal cement leakage after PVP is not scarce among elderly patients. We proposed and internally validated a nomogram that is capable of calculating the risk of intra-spinal canal cement leakage among elderly patients with spine metastases. Careful surgical plan should be conducted among patients with a high risk of developing intra-spinal canal cement leakage.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times