Affordable Access

Multiple DNA-binding factors interact with overlapping specificities at the aryl hydrocarbon response element of the cytochrome P450IA1 gene.

  • Saatcioglu, F
  • Perry, D J
  • Pasco, D S
  • Fagan, J B
Published Article
Molecular and cellular biology
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1990
PMID: 2174107


Three nuclear factors, the Ah receptor, XF1, and XF2, bind sequence specifically to the Ah response elements or xenobiotic response elements (XREs) of the cytochrome P450IA1 (P450c) gene. The interactions of these factors with the Ah response element XRE1 were compared by three independent methods, methylation interference footprinting, orthophenanthroline-Cu+ footprinting, and mobility shift competition experiments, using a series of synthetic oligonucleotides with systematic alterations in the XRE core sequence. These studies established the following (i) all three factors interact sequence specifically with the core sequence of XRE1; (ii) the pattern of contacts made with this sequence by the Ah receptor are different from those made by XF1 and XF2; and (iii) although XF1 and XF2 can be distinguished by the mobility shift assay, the sequence specificities of their interactions with XRE1 are indistinguishable. Further characterization revealed the following additional differences among these three factors: (i) XF1 and XF2 could be extracted from nuclei under conditions quite different from those required for extraction of the Ah receptor; (ii) XF1 and XF2 were present in the nuclei of untreated cells and did not respond to polycyclic compounds, such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and beta-napthoflavone, while nuclear Ah receptor was undetectable in untreated cells and rapidly increased in response to TCDD; (iii) inhibition of protein synthesis did not affect the TCDD-induced appearance of the Ah receptor but substantially decreased the constitutive activities of XF1 and XF2, suggesting that the Ah receptor must be present in untreated cells in an inactive form that can be rapidly activated by polycyclic compounds, while the constitutive expression of XF1 and XF2 depends on the continued synthesis of a relatively unstable protein; (iv) the receptor-deficient and nuclear translocation-defective mutants of the hepatoma cell line Hepa1, which are known to lack nuclear Ah receptor, expressed normal levels of XF1 and XF2, suggesting that the former factor is genetically distinct from the latter two; and (v) a divalent metal ion, probably Zn2+, is known to be an essential cofactor for the Ah receptor but was not required for the DNA-binding activities of XF1 and XF2. Together, these findings indicate that the Ah receptor is distinct from XF1 and XF2, while the latter two activities may be related. Because the DNA-binding domains of these three factors overlap substantially, their binding to XREs is probably mutually exclusive, which suggests that the interplay of these factors at Ah response elements may be important to the regulation of CYP1A1 gene transcription. The results of preliminary transfection experiments with constructs harboring XREs upstream of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene driven by a minimal simian virus 40 promoter are presented that are consistent with this hypothesis.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times