Modeling the Protagonist: The Strategic Use of Discourse Voices
- Authors
- Type
- Published Article
- Journal
- Argumentation
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Publication Date
- Aug 29, 2010
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475–487
- Identifiers
- DOI: 10.1007/s10503-010-9189-0
- Source
- Springer Nature
- Keywords
- License
- Green
Abstract
An argumentative text can be reconstructed as an argumentative discussion between a protagonist and an antagonist. However, such a text is usually not a literal report of a discussion. It is the author of the text who determines how issues are presented, how claims are modeled, how the development of the discussion is presented. Especially when a text has embedded discourse voices that can fulfill the roles of protagonist or antagonist, the author of the text can strongly suggest a specific assignment, suppressing alternatives. In this article examples are presented that show how an author exploits linguistic means—a strategic choice of causal connectives—to suggest a specific reconstruction. The question is raised whether a derailment of this behavior of the author should be characterized as committing the fallacy of the straw man.
