Affordable Access

Access to the full text

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) Is an Empirically Validated Measure of Overreporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: Reply to Butcher et al. (2008)

Authors
  • Ben-Porath, Yossef S.1
  • Greve, Kevin W.2, 3
  • Bianchini, Kevin J.2, 3
  • Kaufmann, Paul M.4
  • 1 Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA , Kent (United States)
  • 2 University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA , New Orleans (United States)
  • 3 Jefferson Neurobehavioral Group, Metairie, LA, USA , Metairie (United States)
  • 4 University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA , Lincoln (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Psychological Injury and Law
Publisher
Springer US
Publication Date
Mar 13, 2009
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
62–85
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s12207-009-9037-4
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

We address issues raised by Butcher et al. (Psychological Injury and the Law 1:191–209, 2008) in their critique of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) and show that their analyses and conclusions are based on faulty premises, a misunderstanding of basic concepts in the assessment of overreporting, a selective review of the literature and mischaracterization of the findings they do cite, problematic analyses of a dataset that had already been similarly analyzed, and a flawed analysis of a legal case they discuss. We complement the review of existing research with some new findings that provide further empirical support and clarification of current interpretive recommendations for proper use of the FBS in evaluations of personal injury litigants and claimants.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times