Affordable Access

Access to the full text

A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design comparison between COVID-19 infection control guidelines’ applicability and their protective value as perceived by Israeli healthcare workers, and healthcare executives’ response

Authors
  • Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat1, 1
  • Cohen, Ricky1
  • Shahbari, Nour Abed Elhadi1
  • Hijazi, Rana1
  • 1 University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838, Israel , Haifa (Israel)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Sep 04, 2020
Volume
9
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00812-8
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) are on the front line of the COVID-19 outbreak, and their constant exposure to infected patients and contaminated surfaces puts them at risk of acquiring and transmitting the infection. Therefore, they must employ protective measures. In practice, HCWs in Israel were not fully prepared for this sudden COVID-19 outbreak. This research aimed to identify and compare: (1) Israeli HCWs’ perceptions regarding the official COVID-19 guidelines’ applicability and their protective value, and (2) HCWs executives’ response to HWCs’ concern regarding personal protective equipment (PPE) shortage.MethodsA mixed-methods sequential explanatory design consists of: (1) An online survey of 242 HCWs about the application of the guidelines and PPE, and (2) Personal interviews of 15 HCWs executives regarding PPE shortage and the measures they are taking to address it.ResultsA significant difference between the perceived applicability and protective value was found for most of the guidelines. Some of the guidelines were perceived as more applicable than protective (hand hygiene, signage at entrance, alcohol rub sanitizers at entrance, and mask for contact with symptomatic patients). Other were perceived as less applicable than protective (prohibited gathering of over 10 people, maintaining a distance of 2 m’, and remote services).ConclusionsHCWs need the support of the healthcare authorities not only to provide missing equipment, but also to communicate the risk to them. Conveying the information with full transparency, while addressing the uncertainty element and engaging the HCWs in evaluating the guidelines, are critical for establishing trust.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times