Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Lymphadenectomy issues in endometrial cancer

Authors
  • Konno, Yosuke1
  • Asano, Hiroshi1
  • Shikama, Ayumi1
  • Aoki, Daisuke1
  • Tanikawa, Michihiro1
  • Oki, Akinori1
  • Horie, Koji1
  • Mitsuhashi, Akira1
  • Kikuchi, Akira1
  • Tokunaga, Hideki1
  • Terao, Yasuhisa1
  • Satoh, Toyomi1
  • Ushijima, Kimio1
  • Ishikawa, Mitsuya1
  • Yaegashi, Nobuo1
  • Watari, Hidemichi1
  • 1 . , (Japan)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
Publication Date
Jan 07, 2021
Volume
32
Issue
2
Identifiers
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e25
PMID: 33470067
PMCID: PMC7930450
Source
PubMed Central
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Review Article
License
Green

Abstract

Objectives This review aims to introduce preoperative scoring systems to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) and ongoing clinical trials to investigate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Methods We summarized previous reports on the preoperative prediction models for LNM and evaluated their validity to omit lymphadenectomy in our recent cohorts. Next, we compared characteristics of two ongoing lymphadenectomy trials (JCOG1412, ECLAT) to examine the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer, and described the details of JCOG1412. Results Lymphadenectomy has been omitted for 64 endometrial cancer patients who met low-risk criteria to omit lymphadenectomy using our scoring system (LNM score) and no lymphatic failure has been observed. Other two models also produced comparable results. Two randomized phase III trials to evaluate survival benefit of lymphadenectomy are ongoing for endometrial cancer. JCOG1412 compares pelvic lymphadenectomy alone with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy to evaluate the therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients at risk of LNM. For quality assurance of lymphadenectomy, we defined several regulations, including lower limit of the number of resected nodes, and submission of photos of dissected area to evaluate thoroughness of lymphadenectomy in the protocol. The latest monitoring report showed that the quality of lymphadenectomy has been well-controlled in JCOG1412. Conclusion Our strategy seems reasonable to omit lymphadenectomy and could be generalized in clinical practice. JCOG1412 is a high-quality lymphadenectomy trial in terms of the quality of surgical procedures, which would draw the bona-fide conclusions regarding the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times