Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Justification of anthropometric empirical indicator (AEI) by digital chest and pelvic X-rays: a comparative scenario with DXA on obesity grounds

Authors
  • Kishore Mohan, K. B.1
  • Anburajan, M.1
  • 1 SRM University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India , Chennai (India)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Publication Date
Mar 28, 2014
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
547–557
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-014-0067-8
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

BackgroundObesity is an abnormal accumulation of body fat directly proportional to reduced life expectancy. Treatment of this ailment should be preceded by proper and accurate assessment of the degree of obesity.ObjectivesThe main objective is the justification of anthropometric empirical indicator (AEI) by the utilization of chest and pelvic radiographs, so that precise measurement of obesity on economical grounds can be manifested. Also, the subsequent objective is to establish a comparative scenario between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and novel, portable, bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA)-based body composition analyzer, MI-105 (Meditech International Inc. India).Materials and methodsThe cross-sectional design was adopted in the present study, in which 20 female participants from urban south India were involved. The measurements of body composition, anthropometry and chest (covering the region from neck to abdomen) as well as hip radiography of the studied population were acquired.ResultsThe higher significant difference of ≤0.001 was evidenced in all female studied population in the main body composition parameters measured by DXA and low-cost BIA. The same framework of significance is applicable to AEI, AEI (image morphed) and AEI (image automatic).ConclusionThe novel-derived parameters: AEI (image morphed) and AEI (image automatic) can precisely gauge obesity and can be the effective alternatives for high-cost DXA. In addition, low-cost BIA-based body composition analyzer can also be the better substitute for DXA.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times