Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Infection prevention practices in the Netherlands: results from a National Survey

Authors
  • Huis, Anita1
  • Schouten, Jeroen1
  • Lescure, Dominique2
  • Krein, Sarah3, 4, 5
  • Ratz, David3, 5
  • Saint, Sanjay3, 4, 5
  • Hulscher, Marlies1
  • Greene, M. Todd3, 4, 5
  • 1 Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, HB, 6500, The Netherlands , Nijmegen (Netherlands)
  • 2 University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, CA, 3000, The Netherlands , Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 3 VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Road, North Campus Research Complex 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA , Ann Arbor (United States)
  • 4 University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA , Ann Arbor (United States)
  • 5 VA/UM Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, USA , Ann Arbor (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Jan 06, 2020
Volume
9
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0667-3
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the extent to which acute care hospitals in the Netherlands have adopted recommended practices to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI).MethodsBetween 18 July 2017 and 31 October 2017, we surveyed the infection prevention teams of all acute care hospitals in the Netherlands. The survey instrument was based on the ‘Translating Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Research into Practice’ (TRIP) questionnaire and adapted to the Dutch context. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the reported regular use of CAUTI, CLABSI, VAP, and CDI prevention practices as well as the hospital characteristics.ResultsOut of 72 eligible hospitals, 47 (65.3%) responded. Surveillance systems for monitoring CAUTI, CLABSI, VAP, and CDI were present in 17.8, 95.4, 26.2, and 77.3% of hospitals, respectively. Antimicrobial stewardship programs have been established in 91.5% of participating hospitals. For CAUTI, the majority of hospitals regularly used aseptic technique during catheter insertion (95%) and portable bladder ultrasound scanners (86.1%). Intermittent catheterization and catheter stop-orders were regularly used by 65.8 and 62.2% of hospitals. For CLABSI, all hospitals regularly used maximum sterile barrier precautions and chlorhexidine gluconate for insertion site antisepsis. Avoidance of the femoral site for central line insertions was regularly used by 65.9% of hospitals. Urinary catheters and central-lines impregnated with antibiotics or antiseptics were rarely used (≤ 5%). Selective decontamination strategies for preventing VAP were used in 84% of hospitals. With the exception of disposable thermometers (31.8%), all prevention practices to prevent CDI were regularly used by more than 80% of hospitals.ConclusionsMost Dutch hospitals report regular use of recommended practices for preventing CLABSI and CDI. Several specific practices to prevent CAUTI and VAP were less frequently used, however, providing an opportunity for improvement.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times