Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Individual dietary specialization in a generalist predator: A stable isotope analysis of urban and rural red foxes.

Authors
  • Scholz, Carolin1
  • Firozpoor, Jasmin2
  • Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie1, 3, 4
  • Gras, Pierre1, 4
  • Schulze, Christoph5
  • Kimmig, Sophia E1
  • Voigt, Christian C2, 4, 6
  • Ortmann, Sylvia2, 4
  • 1 Department of Ecological Dynamics Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin Germany. , (Germany)
  • 2 Department of Evolutionary Ecology Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin Germany. , (Germany)
  • 3 Institute of Ecology Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany. , (Germany)
  • 4 Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB) Berlin Germany. , (Germany)
  • 5 State Laboratory Berlin Brandenburg (LLBB) Frankfurt (Oder) Germany. , (Germany)
  • 6 Institute of Biology Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany. , (Germany)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2020
Volume
10
Issue
16
Pages
8855–8870
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6584
PMID: 32884662
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Some carnivores are known to survive well in urban habitats, yet the underlying behavioral tactics are poorly understood. One likely explanation for the success in urban habitats might be that carnivores are generalist consumers. However, urban populations of carnivores could as well consist of specialist feeders. Here, we compared the isotopic specialization of red foxes in urban and rural environments, using both a population and an individual level perspective. We measured stable isotope ratios in increments of red fox whiskers and potential food sources. Our results reveal that red foxes have a broad isotopic dietary niche and a large variation in resource use. Despite this large variation, we found significant differences between the variance of the urban and rural population for δ13C as well as δ15N values, suggesting a habitat-specific foraging behavior. Although urban regions are more heterogeneous regarding land cover (based on the Shannon index) than rural regions, the dietary range of urban foxes was smaller compared with that of rural conspecifics. Moreover, the higher δ13C values and lower δ15N values of urban foxes suggest a relatively high input of anthropogenic food sources. The diet of most individuals remained largely constant over a longer period. The low intraindividual variability of urban and rural red foxes suggests a relatively constant proportion of food items consumed by individuals. Urban and rural foxes utilized a small proportion of the potentially available isotopic dietary niche as indicated by the low within-individual variation compared to the between-individual variation. We conclude that generalist fox populations consist of individual food specialists in urban and rural populations at least over those periods covered by our study. © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times